Performance
Anthony C. Traina Elementary — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Anthony C. Traina Elementary in Tracy, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
37%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
16%
Exceeded the standard
171
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5 | 33% | 15% | 78 |
| Grade 8 | 40% | 16% | 93 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 47% 466 tested | 44% 460 tested | 37% 171 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 54% 220 tested | 39% 217 tested | 36% 95 tested |
| Male | 42% 246 tested | 49% 243 tested | 38% 76 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| Asian | 59% 123 tested | 61% 123 tested | 59% 46 tested |
| Black or African American | 50% 24 tested | 25% 24 tested | 23% 13 tested |
| Filipino | 76% 25 tested | 64% 25 tested | 82% 11 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino | 31% 175 tested | 33% 171 tested | 24% 68 tested |
| White | 58% 77 tested | 49% 76 tested | 35% 23 tested |
| Two or more races | 47% 34 tested | 32% 34 tested | - |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Economically disadvantaged | 35% 254 tested | 33% 249 tested | 27% 94 tested |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 62% 212 tested | 57% 211 tested | 49% 77 tested |
| English learners | |||
| English learners | 6% 62 tested | 23% 62 tested | 5% 20 tested |
| English learners, 12 months or more | 5% 59 tested | 20% 59 tested | 5% 20 tested |
| Long term English learners | 9% 11 tested | 0% 11 tested | - |
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 59% 64 tested | 56% 64 tested | 55% 29 tested |
| Initial fluent English proficient | 74% 35 tested | 69% 35 tested | 56% 16 tested |
| Ever an English learner | 33% 126 tested | 40% 126 tested | 35% 49 tested |
| Never an English learner | 53% 340 tested | 46% 334 tested | 38% 122 tested |
| English only | 50% 305 tested | 43% 299 tested | 35% 106 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 26% 27 tested | 27% 26 tested | - |
| No reported disability | 49% 439 tested | 45% 434 tested | 37% 163 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent not a high school graduate | 19% 16 tested | 6% 16 tested | - |
| Parent high school graduate | 25% 72 tested | 27% 71 tested | 18% 33 tested |
| Parent some college | 41% 98 tested | 32% 95 tested | 20% 35 tested |
| Parent college graduate | 55% 200 tested | 49% 199 tested | 41% 70 tested |
| Parent graduate school | 67% 72 tested | 72% 72 tested | 74% 27 tested |
View 16 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not foster youth | 47% 466 tested | 44% 460 tested | 37% 171 tested |
| Not migrant education | 47% 466 tested | 44% 460 tested | 37% 171 tested |
| Not armed forces family member | 48% 465 tested | 44% 459 tested | 37% 171 tested |
| Not homeless | 48% 456 tested | 44% 450 tested | 38% 167 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 54% 404 tested | 47% 398 tested | 41% 151 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 28% 116 tested | 27% 113 tested | 22% 45 tested |
| Asian (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 75% 67 tested | 81% 67 tested | 81% 26 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 39% 59 tested | 45% 58 tested | 26% 23 tested |
| Asian (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 39% 56 tested | 38% 56 tested | 30% 20 tested |
| White (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 67% 39 tested | 54% 39 tested | - |
| White (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 50% 38 tested | 43% 37 tested | 38% 13 tested |
| Two or more races (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 35% 17 tested | 35% 17 tested | - |
| Two or more races (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 59% 17 tested | 29% 17 tested | - |
| Filipino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 87% 15 tested | 73% 15 tested | - |
| Black or African American (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 31% 13 tested | 15% 13 tested | - |
| Black or African American (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 73% 11 tested | 36% 11 tested | - |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
27%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
76%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
105
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 13 | 8% | 15% | 38% | 38% | 77% |
| Grade 1 | 15 | 7% | 20% | 60% | 13% | 73% |
| Grade 2 | 13 | 0% | 8% | 62% | 31% | 92% |
| Grade 3 | 15 | 0% | 40% | 47% | 13% | 60% |
| Grade 4 | 12 | 8% | 8% | 50% | 33% | 83% |
| Grade 5 | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 6 | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 7 | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 8 | 11 | 9% | 9% | 45% | 36% | 82% |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (26 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Special Education Services | 95 | 6% | 17% | 49% | 27% | 77% |
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 93 | 5% | 16% | 51% | 28% | 79% |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 68 | 7% | 21% | 46% | 26% | 72% |
| Male | 63 | 5% | 21% | 51% | 24% | 75% |
| Asian | 48 | 2% | 17% | 48% | 33% | 81% |
| Female | 42 | 12% | 10% | 48% | 31% | 79% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 40 | 15% | 15% | 53% | 18% | 70% |
| Primary language: Spanish | 40 | 15% | 15% | 53% | 18% | 70% |
| Not Economically Disadvantaged | 37 | 8% | 8% | 57% | 27% | 84% |
| Primary language: All remaining languages | 28 | 4% | 18% | 50% | 29% | 79% |
| Primary language: Punjabi | 25 | 4% | 16% | 48% | 32% | 80% |
| EL - 1 year in program | 22 | 0% | 18% | 55% | 27% | 82% |
| EL - 6+ years in program | 22 | 0% | 14% | 55% | 32% | 86% |
| EL - 2 years in program | 18 | 6% | 22% | 44% | 28% | 72% |
| EL - 3 years in program | 14 | 14% | 21% | 57% | 7% | 64% |
| EL - less than 1 year in program | 13 | 23% | 15% | 38% | 23% | 62% |
| ELs enrolled fewer than 12 months | 12 | 25% | 17% | 42% | 17% | 58% |
| EL - 4 years in program | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| LTEL | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Special Education Services | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| At-Risk of LTEL | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| White | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 5 years in program | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Homeless | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: Cantonese | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Two or more races | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.