Turtle Rock Elementary — Academic Performance — Irvine, California

Performance

Turtle Rock Elementary — Academic Performance

Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Turtle Rock Elementary in Irvine, California.

Headline Indicator

—

Data not yet captured

Science (CAST)

California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025

CAASPP

74%

Met or exceeded the standard

2025

57%

Exceeded the standard

154

Students tested

Grade	Met or exceeded	Exceeded	Tested
Grade 5	74%	57%	154

Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.

Results by Student Group

CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group

Student group	English Language Arts	Mathematics	Science
All students	84% 543 tested	80% 577 tested	74% 154 tested
Gender
Female	89% 255 tested	79% 270 tested	76% 74 tested
Male	81% 288 tested	81% 307 tested	73% 80 tested
Race and ethnicity
Asian	87% 304 tested	87% 338 tested	77% 96 tested
Hispanic or Latino	63% 54 tested	47% 55 tested	37% 19 tested
White	85% 124 tested	78% 122 tested	83% 29 tested
Two or more races	87% 47 tested	88% 48 tested	-
Socioeconomic status
Economically disadvantaged	66% 102 tested	62% 108 tested	48% 29 tested
Not economically disadvantaged	89% 441 tested	84% 469 tested	80% 125 tested
English learners
English learners	33% 57 tested	46% 94 tested	17% 29 tested
English learners, 12 months or more	33% 57 tested	49% 57 tested	26% 19 tested
English learners, under 12 months	-	42% 36 tested	-
At risk of becoming a long term English learner	33% 15 tested	27% 15 tested	-
Reclassified fluent English proficient	88% 78 tested	94% 78 tested	89% 19 tested
Initial fluent English proficient	97% 122 tested	93% 122 tested	94% 33 tested
Ever an English learner	65% 135 tested	67% 172 tested	46% 48 tested
Never an English learner	91% 408 tested	86% 405 tested	87% 106 tested
English only	88% 286 tested	82% 283 tested	84% 73 tested
Disability
Students with disabilities	63% 59 tested	55% 58 tested	50% 12 tested
No reported disability	87% 484 tested	83% 519 tested	76% 142 tested
Parent education
Parent college graduate	56% 36 tested	63% 57 tested	13% 15 tested
Parent graduate school	85% 108 tested	84% 119 tested	81% 27 tested

View 14 further student groups reported by the state

Student group	English Language Arts	Mathematics	Science
Not foster youth	84% 543 tested	80% 577 tested	74% 154 tested
Not migrant education	84% 543 tested	80% 577 tested	74% 154 tested
Not homeless	84% 541 tested	80% 573 tested	75% 153 tested
Not armed forces family member	84% 537 tested	81% 570 tested	74% 153 tested
Fluent English proficient and English only	90% 486 tested	87% 483 tested	87% 125 tested
Parent education declined to state	87% 393 tested	83% 391 tested	83% 108 tested
Asian (Not Econ. Disadvantaged)	91% 264 tested	89% 294 tested	79% 84 tested
White (Not Econ. Disadvantaged)	88% 105 tested	79% 104 tested	84% 25 tested
Asian (Econ. Disadvantaged)	60% 40 tested	73% 44 tested	67% 12 tested
Two or more races (Not Econ. Disadvantaged)	89% 37 tested	97% 37 tested	-
Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged)	61% 31 tested	48% 33 tested	18% 11 tested
Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged)	65% 23 tested	45% 22 tested	-
White (Econ. Disadvantaged)	74% 19 tested	72% 18 tested	-
Two or more races (Econ. Disadvantaged)	-	55% 11 tested	-

Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.

English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)

English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025

2025

24%

Level 4, well developed

The level used towards reclassification

2025

59%

Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed

152

English learners tested

Grade	Tested	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Level 4	Level 3 or 4
Kindergarten	16	6%	6%	44%	44%	88%
Grade 1	19	11%	32%	26%	32%	58%
Grade 2	24	13%	8%	63%	17%	79%
Grade 3	26	35%	12%	31%	23%	54%
Grade 4	22	18%	36%	32%	14%	45%
Grade 5	29	38%	21%	21%	21%	41%
Grade 6	16	6%	38%	25%	31%	56%

Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.

View ELPAC by student group (27 groups)

Student group	Tested	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Level 4	Level 3 or 4
No Special Education Services	132	20%	20%	33%	27%	60%
Not Economically Disadvantaged	111	22%	20%	32%	26%	59%
Asian	110	25%	20%	27%	28%	55%
ELs enrolled 12 months or more	100	8%	23%	39%	30%	69%
Male	93	23%	20%	34%	23%	57%
Primary language: Mandarin (Putonghua)	71	25%	18%	27%	30%	56%
Female	59	17%	22%	34%	27%	61%
EL - less than 1 year in program	53	45%	17%	25%	13%	38%
ELs enrolled fewer than 12 months	52	44%	17%	25%	13%	38%
Economically Disadvantaged	41	17%	24%	39%	20%	59%
Primary language: All remaining languages	33	24%	21%	33%	21%	55%
EL - 1 year in program	32	0%	22%	38%	41%	78%
EL - 2 years in program	29	7%	21%	45%	28%	72%
White	21	0%	38%	43%	19%	62%
Special Education Services	20	20%	30%	40%	10%	50%
Hispanic or Latino	17	18%	12%	65%	6%	71%
At-Risk of LTEL	15	13%	40%	20%	27%	47%
Primary language: Korean	14	21%	29%	29%	21%	50%
Primary language: Spanish	14	7%	14%	71%	7%	79%
EL - 4 years in program	11	9%	36%	27%	27%	55%
EL - 3 years in program	10	-	-	-	-	-
EL - 5 years in program	10	-	-	-	-	-
EL - 6+ years in program	7	-	-	-	-	-
Primary language: Arabic	7	-	-	-	-	-
Primary language: Cantonese	7	-	-	-	-	-
Primary language: Russian	5	-	-	-	-	-
Military	4	-	-	-	-	-

Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.

Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.